2(x-3.5)=10怎么做_百度作业帮
2(x-3.5)=10怎么做
2(x-3.5)=10x-3.5=10/2x=5+3.5x=8.5
2x-7=102x=17x=8.5
有两种方法2(X－3.5）=10
2X—2X3.5=10
X—3.5=10÷22X=10+7
X=5+3.5X=17÷2
X=8.5X=8.5
2-x=3.5解: x=6.2-3.5x=2.7本站已经通过实名认证，所有内容由姜玉华大夫本人发表
73岁，做彩超膀胱癌3.5厘米的肿瘤。请问怎么治疗？_膀胱...
状态：就诊前
可以考虑经膀胱镜手术治疗。
大夫郑重提醒：因不能面诊患者，无法全面了解病情，以上建议仅供参考，具体诊疗请一定到医院在医生指导下进行！
投诉类型：
投诉说明：（200个汉字以内）
姜玉华大夫的信息
头颈及胸腹部肿瘤的放射治疗(普通放疗、三维适型放射治疗、调强放射治疗）、化疗、以放射治疗为主的综合治疗...
姜玉华，主任医师。
1988年7月毕业于山东医科大学医学系(现山东大学医学院），获学士学位。分配至山东大...
肿瘤综合科可通话专家
上海胸科医院
肺部肿瘤临床医学中心
郑大一附院
副主任医师
天津肿瘤医院
胰腺肿瘤科
武警总医院
郑大一附院
山东省立医院
青岛市中心医院
副主任医师
副主任医师
黄陂人民医院
好大夫在线电话咨询服务你当前的位置 :
3.5天猫女人节
承接页具体怎么做0/41
里面有个承接页，具体模板什么的有没有？或者把参与活动的宝贝作为一个店内的类目，直接用宝贝的分类页面可以不？
登录淘宝之后就可以发表回复了, 快淘宝吧！
matrixgapp.n.et22*（3.5-X)=1.2 怎么做？_百度知道
2*（3.5-X)=1.2 怎么做？
5-0.9，如果满意记得采纳如果有其他问题请采纳本题后另发点击向我求助收起2*（3，答题不易.5-x=0，谢谢;如果本题有什么不明白可以追问;x=2.6;x=3.6，请谅解.5-X)=1.2 3
某数的一半减去18是6.5，求这个数？帮忙哦！
这个数=(18+6.5)×2=24.5×2=49；
设这个数为x，则有：x/2-18=6.5;x/2=24.5;x=24.5×2;x=49;这个数为49
谢谢，一个数加上3分之2的和比3少2分之一，这个数是？
设这个数为x，则有;x+2/3=3-1/2;x+2/3=5/2;x=5/2-2/3;x=15/6-4/6;x=11/6;请采纳
其他类似问题
按默认排序
其他2条回答
*（3.5-X = 0.6X = 2.5-X)=1.23
2*（3.5-X)=1.2 3.5-x=0.6;x=3.5-0.6;x=2.9;
等待您来回答
下载知道APP
随时随地咨询
出门在外也不愁后使用快捷导航没有帐号？
查看: 890|回复: 6
最后登录在线时间246 小时寄托币487 声望4 注册时间阅读权限25帖子精华0积分382UID2745223
中级会员, 积分 382, 距离下一级还需 368 积分
声望4 寄托币487 注册时间精华0帖子
时间来不及了20天，并且有工作，一天加上背单词的时间，大概共有6个小时左右，申请的专业也没有要求要gre，但是为了对得起报名费，还是觉得要认真对待，但不敢奢望能分数多高，只想拿个3.5分，我应该怎么做呢？请大家指教一下……谢谢
最后登录在线时间434 小时寄托币1598 声望5 注册时间阅读权限30帖子精华0积分1268UID2668603
高级会员, 积分 1268, 距离下一级还需 332 积分
声望5 寄托币1598 注册时间精华0帖子
大众低分现在都是3.0了。。。3，5的话 建议argu好好准备拿4分，issue不要太烂3分还挺好拿。
最后登录在线时间271 小时寄托币522 声望0 注册时间阅读权限25帖子精华0积分489UID2137729
中级会员, 积分 489, 距离下一级还需 261 积分
声望0 寄托币522 注册时间精华0帖子
作文不用背单词吧？LZ专心复习AW就是了
最后登录在线时间4635 小时寄托币23278 声望3952 注册时间阅读权限255帖子精华50积分49068UID2487572
声望3952 寄托币23278 注册时间精华50帖子
ISSUE和ARGUMENT单独评分 然后算平均 评分标准在下面 自己算就可以了
评分标准：
Perspective on an Issue
________________________________
A 6 paper presents a cogent, well-articulated analysis of the complexities of the issue and conveys meaning skillfully. A typical paper in this category
• presents an insightful position on the issue
• develops the position with compelling reasons and/or persuasive examples
• sustains a well-focused, well-organized analysis, connecting ideas logically
• expresses ideas fluently and precisely, using effective vocabulary and sentence variety
• demonstrates facility with the conventions (i.e., grammar, usage, and mechanics) of standard written English but may have minor errors
_______________________________
A 5 paper presents a generally thoughtful, well-developed analysis of the complexities of the issue and conveys meaning clearly. A typical paper in this category
• presents a well-considered position on the issue
• develops the position with logically sound reasons and/or well-chosen examples
• is focused and generally well organized, connecting ideas appropriately
• expresses ideas clearly and well, using appropriate vocabulary and sentence variety
• demonstrates facility with the conventions of standard written English but may have minor errors
________________________________
A 4 paper presents a competent analysis of the issue and conveys meaning adequately. A typical paper in this category
• presents a clear position on the issue
• develops the position on the issue with relevant reasons and/or examples
• is adequately focused and organized
• expresses ideas with reasonable clarity
• generally demonstrates control of the conventions of standard written English but may have some errors
___________________________________
A 3 paper demonstrates some competence in its analysis of the issue and in conveying meaning but is obviously flawed. A typical paper in this category exhibits ONE OR MORE of the following characteristics:
• is vague or limited in presenting or developing a position on the issue
• is weak in the use of relevant reasons or examples
• is poorly focused and/or poorly organized
• has problems in language and sentence structure that result in a lack of clarity
• contains occasional major errors or frequent minor errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics that can interfere with meaning
______________________________
A 2 paper demonstrates serious weaknesses in analytical writing. A typical paper in this category exhibits ONE OR MORE of the following characteristics:
• is unclear or seriously limited in presenting or developing a position on the issue
• provides few, if any, relevant reasons or examples
• is unfocused and/or disorganized
• has serious problems in the use of language and sentence structure that frequently interfere with meaning
• contains serious errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics that frequently obscure meaning
_______________________________________
A 1 paper demonstrates fundamental deficiencies in analytical writing skills. A typical paper in this category exhibits ONE OR MORE of the following characteristics:
• provides little or no evidence of the ability to understand and analyze the issue
• provides little or no evidence of the ability to develop an organized response
• has severe problems in language and sentence structure that persistently interfere with meaning
• contains pervasive errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics that result in incoherence
_______________________________________
Off topic, in a foreign language, merely copies the topic, consists of only keystroke characters, or is illegible, blank, or nonverbal
_______________________________________
____________________________
A 6 paper presents a cogent, well-articulated critique of the argument andconveys meaning skillfully.
A typical paper in this category
• clearly identifies important features of the argument andanalyzes them insightfully
• develops ideas cogently, organizes them logically, andconnects them with clear transitions
• effectively supports the main points of the critique
• demonstrates control of language, including appropriateword choice and sentence variety
• demonstrates facility with the conventions (i.e., grammar,usage, and mechanics) of standard written English but may have minor errors
_______________________________________
A 5 paper presents a generally thoughtful, well-developed critique of theargument and conveys meaning clearly.
A typical paper in this category
• clearly identifies important features of the argument andanalyzes them in a generally perceptive way
• develops ideas clearly, organizes them logically, andconnects them with appropriate transitions
• sensibly supports the main points of the critique
• demonstrates control of language, including appropriateword choice and sentence variety
• demonstrates facility with the conventions of standardwritten English but may have minor errors
___________________________________
A 4 paper presents a competent critique of the argument and conveysmeaning adequately.
A typical paper in this category
• identifies and analyzes important features of the argument
• develops and organizes ideas satisfactorily but may notconnect them with transitions
• supports the main points of the critique
• demonstrates sufficient control of language to expressideas with reasonable clarity
• generally demonstrates control of the conventions ofstandard written English but may have some errors
___________________________________
A 3 paper demonstrates some competence in its critique of the argument andin conveying meaning but is obviously flawed.
A typical paper in this category exhibits ONE OR MORE of the followingcharacteristics:
• does not identify or analyze most of the important featuresof the argument, although some analysis of the argument is present
• mainly analyzes tangential or irrelevant matters, orreasons poorly
• is limited in the logical development and organization ofideas
• offers support of little relevance and value for pointsof the critique
• lacks clarity in expressing ideas
• contains occasional major errors or frequent minor errorsin grammar, usage, or mechanics that can interfere with meaning
_______________________________________
A 2 paper demonstrates serious weaknesses in analytical writing.
A typical paper in this category exhibits ONE OR MORE of the followingcharacteristics:
• does not present a critique based on logical analysis,but may instead present the writer's own views on the subject
• does not develop ideas, or is disorganized and illogical
• provides little, if any, relevant or reasonable support
• has serious problems in the use of language and in sentencestructure that frequently interfere with meaning
• contains serious errors in grammar, usage, or mechanicsthat frequently obscure meaning
___________________________________
A 1 paper demonstrates fundamental deficiencies in both analysis ANDwriting .
A typical paper in this category exhibits MORE THAN ONE of the followingcharacteristics:
• provides little or no evidence of the ability to understandand analyze the argument
• provides little or no evidence of the ability to developan organized response
• has severe problems in language and sentence structurethat persistently interfere with meaning
• contains pervasive errors in grammar, usage, or mechanicsthat result in incoherence
_______________________________________
Off topic, in a foreign language, merely copies the topic, consists ofonly keystroke characters, or is illegible, blank, or nonverbal.
_______________________________________
最后登录在线时间4635 小时寄托币23278 声望3952 注册时间阅读权限255帖子精华50积分49068UID2487572
声望3952 寄托币23278 注册时间精华50帖子
作文不用背单词吧？LZ专心复习AW就是了
lampard89 发表于
巧妇难为无米之炊~
最后登录在线时间2057 小时寄托币14569 声望1554 注册时间阅读权限100帖子精华18积分10995UID2630498
声望1554 寄托币14569 注册时间精华18帖子
目标要定高一点的，如果只把目标定在3.5，恐怕拿到3.5就不是那么容易了~
Die luft der Freiheit weht
the wind of freedom blows
最后登录在线时间27 小时寄托币32 声望50 注册时间阅读权限15帖子精华0积分71UID3591562
寄托新兵, 积分 71, 距离下一级还需 79 积分
声望50 寄托币32 注册时间精华0帖子
AdelineShen 发表于
目标要定高一点的，如果只把目标定在3.5，恐怕拿到3.5就不是那么容易了~
你这样说的很对 想要射星星 就得射到月亮
Sagittarius射手座
Sagittarius射手座
AW活动特殊奖
【AW】AW活动特殊奖
AW作文修改奖
【AW】AW作文修改奖
IBT Elegance
【IBT】IBT Elegance
挑战ETS奖章
【考试】挑战ETS奖章
US Advisor
【美国】US Advisor
US Assistant
【美国】US Assistant
【版主】退休版主
【美国】美版版主
Cancer巨蟹座
Cancer巨蟹座
GRE梦想之帆
【GRE】GRE梦想之帆
GRE斩浪之魂
【GRE】GRE斩浪之魂
GRE守护之星
【GRE】GRE守护之星
US Applicant
【美国】US Applicant
是时候把所有Offer报上，给自己一个总结了！ ：200元机票现金券+GTB红包！
广州九微教育科技有限公司
Copyright &
GTER All Rights Reserved
Powered by}