姿势控制训练对脑卒中偏瘫患者足底压力、平衡功能和步行功能改善的影响--《河北医药》2018年03期
姿势控制训练对脑卒中偏瘫患者足底压力、平衡功能和步行功能改善的影响
【摘要】：目的观察姿势控制训练对脑卒中偏瘫患者足底压力、平衡功能及步行改善的影响。方法选取脑卒中偏瘫患者120例,随机分为研究组和对照组,每组60例。对照组接受常规康复治疗,研究组在对照组基础上进行姿势控制训练。2组均接受20次康复治疗,每周3次,每次90 min。比较2组患者治疗后足底压力,平衡功能以及治疗前后步行功能。结果治疗后,研究组患者健足前半足和后半足峰值压力显著低于对照组[前半足:(158.52±56.71)N、(218.83±73.35)N,t=5.04,P0.05;后半足:(257.36±85.45)N、(311.47±97.33)N,t=3.24,P0.05],患足前半足和后半足峰值压力显著低于对照组[前半足:(85.35±37.62)N、(133.49±66.23)N,t=4.90,P0.05;后半足:(159.84±59.16)N、(186.52±74.37)N,t=2.17,P0.05];研究组健足前半足和后半足平均压力显著低于对照组[前半足:(54.13±14.58)%、(73.57±18.25)%,t=6.45,P0.05;后半足:(67.46±17.36)%、(88.75±20.87)%,t=6.07,P0.05],患足前半足和后半足平均压力显著高于对照组[前半足:(49.51±16.98)%、(37.72±20.34)%,t=3.45,P0.05;后半足:(53.37±12.38)%、(44.63±15.47)%,t=3.42,P0.05]。研究组PASS显著高于对照组[(33.9±2.6)分、(31.2±2.7)分,t=5.58,P0.05],压力中心偏移的椭圆轨迹长度显著低于对照组[(160.5±65.5)mm、(241.2±71.3)mm,t=6.46,P0.05],包络椭圆面积显著低于对照组[(169.5±34.5)mm~2、(184.3±42.7)mm~2,t=2.09,P0.05],比值显著低于对照组[(0.9±0.2)、(1.3±0.2),t=10.95,P0.05]。2组患者治疗后TUGT均显著降低[研究组:(20.6±4.5)s、(14.7±3.4)s,对照组:(21.8±3.7)s、(18.3±4.2)s,t值分别为6.27,1.08,P0.05],且研究组TUGT显著低于对照组(t=5.16,P0.05)。2组患者治疗后的6 min步行测试分值均显著升高[研究组:(216.98±99.99)m、(291.76±96.70)m,对照组:(207.53±114.06)m、(241.84±90.29)m,t值分别为3.95,2.34,P0.05];且研究组显著高于对照组(t=2.92,P0.05)。结论姿势控制训练可显著提高脑卒中偏瘫患者的平衡及步行功能。
【作者单位】：
【基金】：
【分类号】：R493;R743.3
欢迎：、、)
支持CAJ、PDF文件格式，仅支持PDF格式
【相似文献】
中国期刊全文数据库
文诗广,陈伟群;[J];现代康复;2000年05期
陈伟秀;徐燕;;[J];解放军护理杂志;2010年23期
张蕲,陈俊宁,杨佩君,梅元武,朱建元,陈凯敏,王美芬,赵振杰,陆巍,童萼塘;[J];中国康复;1998年02期
金冬梅,燕铁斌;[J];中国康复理论与实践;2002年03期
董凤姣;[J];中国临床康复;2004年22期
刘光华;杨爱萍;刘邦忠;王平;林岳军;陆志辉;陈建新;;[J];中国康复医学杂志;2011年07期
韩瑞,倪朝民,李厥宝,孟兆祥;[J];中国康复医学杂志;2005年01期
刘蓓蓓;丁勤能;王岩;;[J];东南国防医药;2014年04期
田沈,桑德春,苑之明;[J];中国康复理论与实践;2003年06期
陈海霞;宁宁;;[J];现代护理;2006年23期
中国重要会议论文全文数据库
Nanayakkara K.A.D.T.L.;燕铁斌;;[A];继往开来
与时俱进——2003年康复医学发展论坛暨庆祝中国康复医学会成立20周年学术大会论文集[C];2003年
蔡涵;林建强;;[A];2011年浙江省物理医学与康复学学术年会暨康复新进展学习班论文汇编[C];2011年
陈天聪;;[A];2011年浙江省物理医学与康复学学术年会暨康复新进展学习班论文汇编[C];2011年
陈君;贾月霞;;[A];中国康复医学会第四届会员代表大会暨第三届中国康复医学学术大会论文汇编[C];2001年
潘虹;;[A];2011年甘肃省中医药学会学术年会论文集[C];2011年
李茜;;[A];中国医师协会第二届康复医学论坛、中国康复医学会第四届青年学术会议、北京康复医学会第三届会员代表大会论文集[C];2005年
李平仙;;[A];全国内科护理学术交流暨专题讲座会议论文汇编[C];2005年
尤欣;;[A];中国水利电力医学科学技术学会临床医学专业委员会外科专业、护理专业2007年会论文汇编[C];2007年
苏国强;;[A];2011年浙江省物理医学与康复学学术年会暨康复新进展学习班论文汇编[C];2011年
秦文珍;;[A];2013年河南省神经系统疾病护理新进展学术会议论文集[C];2013年
中国硕士学位论文全文数据库
王翠肖;[D];河北大学;2017年
石素宁;[D];辽宁医学院;2015年
张明顼;[D];山西医科大学;2016年
李杨;[D];吉林大学;2016年
张冰倩;[D];河北医科大学;2016年
尹傲冉;[D];安徽医科大学;2014年
李瑞;[D];南京医科大学;2014年
许伟成;[D];暨南大学;2013年
杨洁;[D];安徽医科大学;2014年
邱瑜;[D];山西医科大学;2017年
&快捷付款方式
&订购知网充值卡
400-819-9993Next Article in Journal
Next Article in Special Issue
Previous Article in Journal
Previous Article in Special Issue
Choose your preferred view mode
Please select whether you prefer to view the MDPI pages with a view tailored for mobile displays or to view the MDPI
pages in the normal scrollable desktop version. This selection will be stored into your cookies and used automatically
in next visits. You can also change the view style at any point from the main header when using the pages with your
mobile device.
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
MDPI & Marine Drugs
Article Versions
Related Info
More by Authors
Export Article
Create a SciFeed alert for new publications
With following keywords
aromatic polyketides
fluostatins
gene cluster
genome mining
marine actinomycetes
By following authors
Xiaoyan Yang
Guiyang Wang
Mengjie Zhou
Fawang Liu
Yingtao Zhang
Minghua Chen
Donghui Yang
One email with all search results
One email for each search
Quick Links
Fluostatins M–Q Featuring a 6-5-6-6 Ring Skeleton and High Oxidized A-Rings from Marine Streptomyces sp. PKU-MA00045
Jing Jin 1,
Xiaoyan Yang 1,
Tan Liu 1,
Hua Xiao 1,
Guiyang Wang 1,
Mengjie Zhou 1,
Fawang Liu 1,
Yingtao Zhang 1,
Dong Liu 1,
Minghua Chen 2,
Wei Cheng 1,
Donghui Yang 1,*
Ming Ma 1,*
State Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, Department of Natural Medicines, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, 38 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China
Institute of Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 1 Tiantanxili, Beijing 100050, China
Correspondence:
(M.M.); Tel.: +86-10- (D.Y.); +86-10- (M.M.)
Received: 6 February 2018 / Accepted: 5 March 2018 / Published: 9 March 2018
Aromatic polyketides from marine actinomycetes have received increasing attention due to their unusual structures and potent bioactivities. Compared to their terrestrial counterparts, marine aromatic polyketides have been less discovered and their structural and biological diversities are far from being fully investigated. In this study, we employed a PCR-based genome mining method to discover aromatic polyketides in our marine bacteria collection. Five new atypical angucyclinones, fluostatins M–Q (1–5) featuring a unique 6-5-6-6 ring skeleton, were discovered from one “positive” Streptomyces sp. PKU-MA00045. The structures of fluostatins M–Q (1–5) were elucidated based on comprehensive spectroscopic analyses and the crystallographic structure of fluostatin P (4), which contains the most oxidized A-ring, was solved by X-ray diffraction analysis with Cu Kα radiation. Compared to the published 16 fluostatin analogues, fluostatins M–Q (1–5) contained a different methoxy group attached at C-7 and hydroxy group attached at C-4, enriching the structural diversity of aromatic polyketides from marine actinomycetes. Genome sequencing of Streptomyces sp. PKU-MA00045 revealed the biosynthetic gene cluster of fluostatins M–Q (1–5), which contained different genes and gene organizations compared to known fluostatin gene clusters, facilitating the investigation of the biosynthesis of the unique 6-5-6-6 ring skeleton in all fluostatins.
marine actinomycetes
1. IntroductionMarine actinomycetes distributed in various habitats including sea deposits, sponges, corals, molluscs, seagrasses and mangroves are emerging as important producers of structurally complex and bioactive natural products [,,,]. Since the first marine actinomycete, Rhodococcus marinonascens, was taxonomically described [], new genera and species of marine actinomycetes have been extensively isolated and identified [,,]. The new genus Salinispora, which is the first marine actinomycete characterized by seawater or sea salts-obligate, has become a model organism for natural products discovery []. Varied families of natural products from marine actinomycetes with diverse bioactivities have been recently reviewed [,,,]. In the natural products produced by marine actinomycetes, aromatic polyketides have received increasing attention especially in the last two decades. These natural products have been less discovered compared to their terr however, most of them possess unusual structures or potent bioactivities. Lomaiviticins A and B, which were discovered from Salinispora pacifica, contain unique dimeric diazobenzofluorene glycoside structures and show potent cytotoxicities against human cancer cell lines [,]; trioxacarcin D–F, which were discovered from marine Streptomyces sp. B8652, contain high oxidized polycyclic structures and show cytotoxicities, antibacterial and antimalarial activities []; and komodoquinone A, which was discovered from marine Streptomyces sp. KS3, is a new anthracycline polyketide and shows neuritogenic activity [] (). Representative new aromatic polyketides that were discovered from marine actinomycetes are summarized in , highlighting marine actinomycetes as the important producers of this family of natural products.Aromatic polyketides from actinomycetes are mainly produced by type II polyketide synthases (PKS) [,]. The type II PKS contains three core enzymes: the ketosynthase (KSα), the chain length factor (KSβ) and the acyl carrier protein (ACP). The KSα and KSβ form a heterodimer catalyzing the ACP-templated decarboxylative condensations of acyl-CoA starter unit and malonyl-CoA extender units to produce the linear polyketide intermediate, then other enzymes in the biosynthetic pathway such as cyclases, aromatases, reductases, oxidases convert the linear polyketide intermediate into final aromatic polyketides [,,]. The biosynthetic gene clusters of aromatic polyketides, containing the encoding genes of type II PKSs and other proteins, can be predicted based on bioinformatics analysis such as antiSMASH (antibiotics & Secondary Metabolite Analysis Shell) analysis [] after genome sequencing, and the advanced methods based on searching and analyzing distributed domains within proteins have made the functional prediction more feasible and accurate [,,]. In this study, we report the discovery of five new fluostatin analogues (1–5) from marine Streptomyces sp. PKU-MA00045, based on a PCR screening using the degenerate primers designed from the conserved sequences of KSαs and KSβs in the biosynthesis of four aromatic polyketides. Fluostatins M–Q (1–5) are atypical angucyclinones featuring a 6-5-6-6 ring skeleton and high oxidized A-rings (), enriching the structural diversity of aromatic polyketides from marine actinomycetes. The biosynthetic gene cluster of fluostatins M–Q (1–5) was identified based on bioinformatics analysis after genome sequencing of Streptomyces sp. PKU-MA00045 and comparison with published gene clusters, setting the stage for future investigation of the biosynthesis of the unique 6-5-6-6 ring skeleton and high oxidized A-rings.
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Genome Mining, Fermentation, Isolation and Phylogenetic AnalysisWe have constructed a marine bacteria library containing strains isolated from sponges, corals and deposits collected from South China Sea []. To discover more aromatic polyketides from this library, we carried out a PCR screening targeting type II PKSs with genomic DNAs of strains in the library as the templates, using the degenerate primers designed from the conserved sequences of KSαs and KSβs in tetracenomycin, daunorubicin, actinorhodin and fredericamycin biosynthesis []. In total, 167 strains in the library were screened and 12 strains were identified as the “positive hits”, whose PCR products were analyzed by the agarose gel electrophoresis (). All 12 PCR products were sequenced and confirmed to encode type II PKSs with high sequence identities to known homologues ().It is well known that the metabolite profile of a given strain is medium dependent. To investigate the chemotypes of the 12 potential aromatic polyketides producers, we fermented the 12 strains in small-scale (50 mL) using four different media (see ), and analyzed the crude extracts after the small-scale fermentation by HPLC. The HPLC analysis showed that the crude extract of strain PKU-MA00045 in medium M4 provided abundant natural products under the UV detection at 254 nm. Thus, a large-scale fermentation (15 L) of strain PKU-MA00045 in medium M4 was carried out. Five new fluostatin analogues (1–5) were isolated with a combination of chromatographic methods, and their structures were elucidated with comprehensive spectroscopic analyses. Strain PKU-MA00045 was identified as one Streptomyces species based on the phylogenetic analysis by the sequence alignments of 16S rRNAs with different Streptomyces homologues (), adding more evidence to the conclusion that angucyclines and angucyclinones are exclusively discovered from actinomycetes [].
2.2. Structural Elucidation of Compounds 1–5 and Biological Activity AssaysCompound 1 was obtained as orange solid. HRESIMS analysis afforded an [M - H]- ion at m/z 339.0870, giving the molecular formula of 1 as C19H16O6. The 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR spectra of 1 resembled that of fluostatin B [] except that 1 gave additional resonances at δH 4.11 (s, H3-13) and δC 57.5 (C-13) attributing to one methyl group ( and ), suggesting that 1 only contains one more methyl group than fluostatin B. The correlation between the resonances at δH 4.11 (s, H3-13) and δC 57.5 (C-13) in the HSQC spectrum in 1 confirmed the occurrence of the methyl group, and the correlation between H-13 and C-7 in the HMBC spectrum in 1 confirmed the methylation of the hydroxy group at C-7 (A). Therefore, the planar structure of 1 was identified as 7-O-methyl-fluostatin B. In the ROESY spectrum of 1, the correlations of H-12 with H-2, H-12 with 2-OH suggested that the methyl group attached at C-3, which is a larger moiety than H-3, took a more stable equ the correlation of H-3 with H-2 and the absence of correlation of H-3 with 2-OH suggested that the axial H-3 and equatorial H-2 were on the same side of A- the correlation of axial H-3 with 1-OH instead of H-1 (the signal of 1-OH overlapped with that of H-1), which was confirmed by the absence of the correlation in the ROESY spectrum with D2O added (), suggested that H-3 and 1-OH were on the same side of A-ring (B). Therefore, the absolute configuration of 1 could be either (1R, 2R, 3S) or (1S, 2S, 3R). The experimental electronic circular dichroism (ECD) spectrum of 1 matched that of the calculated ECD spectrum of (1R, 2R, 3S)-1 instead of that of (1S, 2S, 3R)-1 (A), identifying the absolute configuration of 1 as (1R, 2R, 3S). Thus, compound 1 was identified as (1R, 2R, 3S)-7-O-methyl-fluostatin B and named as fluostatin M.Compound 2 was obtained as orange solid. HRESIMS analysis afforded an [M - H]- ion at m/z 341.1023, giving the molecular formula of 2 as C19H18O6. The 1H-NMR spectrum of 2 resembled that of 1 except that two additional resonances at δH 4.41 (dd, J = 7.8, 4.0 Hz, H-4) and δH 4.81 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 4-OH) occurred in 2, and the resonances at δH 3.17 (qd, J = 6.8, 2.3 Hz, H-3), δH 7.40 (s, H-5), δH 4.01 (dd, J = 3.5, 2.3 Hz, H-2) and δH 5.46 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, H-1) in 1 shifted upfield to δH 2.24 (m, H-3), δH 7.00 (s, H-5), δH 3.75 (td, J = 4.5, 2.3 Hz, H-2) and δH 5.12 (t, J = 4.3 Hz, H-1) in 2, respectively (). The COSY spectrum of 2 showed that the resonances at δH 4.41 (dd, J = 7.8, 4.0 Hz, H-4), δH 4.81 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 4-OH), δH 2.24 (m, H-3), δH 3.75 (td, J = 4.5, 2.3 Hz, H-2) and δH 5.12 (t, J = 4.3 Hz, H-1) formed one coupling system (A). These different chemical shifts between the 1H-NMR spectra of 1 and 2 and the coupling system in the COSY spectrum of 2, in combination with the molecular formula of 2, suggested that the only difference between 1 and 2 was that the carbonyl group at C-4 in 1 was replaced by a hydroxy group in 2. This was confirmed by that the resonance at δC 197.7 (C-4) in 1 was replaced by δC 69.5 (C-4) in 2, the resonances at δC 41.6 (C-3) in 1 shifted upfield to δC 33.3 (C-3) in 2 and the resonances at δC 134.0 (C-4a) in 1 shifted downfield to δC 143.9 (C-4a) in 2, in the 13C-NMR spectra of 1 and 2 (). The correlations of H-4 with C-5, H-4 with C-12, H-4 with C-2, 4-OH with C-4 and 4-OH with C-4a in the HMBC spectrum of 2 further confirmed the hydroxy group attached at C-4 (A). Thus, the planar structure of 2 was identified. In the ROESY spectrum of 2, the strong correlations of H-12 with H-4, H-12 with 4-OH suggested that the methyl group attached at C-3 took an equ the correlations of the axial H-3 with H-4, H-2 and 1-OH suggested that H-3, H-4, H-2 and 1-OH were on the same side of A-ring (B). Therefore, the absolute configuration of 2 could be either (1R, 2R, 3R, 4S) or (1S, 2S, 3S, 4R). The experimental electronic circular dichroism (ECD) spectrum of 2 matched that of the calculated ECD spectrum of (1R, 2R, 3R, 4S)-2 instead of that of (1S, 2S, 3S, 4R)-2 (B). Thus, compound 2’s absolute configuration was identified as (1R, 2R, 3R, 4S) and named as fluostatin N.Compound 3 was obtained as orange solid. HRESIMS analysis afforded an [M - H]- ion at m/z 325.1084, giving the molecular formula of 3 as C19H18O5. The 1H-NMR spectrum of 3 resembled that of 2 except that the resonance at δH 5.19 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 2-OH) in 2 disappeared in 3, the resonance at δH 3.75 (td, J = 4.5, 2.3 Hz, H-2) in 2 was replaced by δH 1.86 (td, J = 13.6, 4.0 Hz, H-2a) and δH 1.52 (dt, J = 13.6, 2.5 Hz, H-2b) in 3, and the resonance at δH 5.12 (t, J = 4.3 Hz, H-1) in 2 shifted downfield to δH 5.30 (m, H-1) in 3 (). The 13C-NMR spectrum of 3 resembled that of 2 except that the resonance at δC 74.0 (C-2) in 2 was replaced by δC 33.0 (C-2) in 3, the resonance at δC 66.2 (C-1) and δC 33.3 (C-3) in 2 shifted upfield to δC 60.4 (C-1) and δC 28.1 (C-3) in 3, respectively (). These different chemical shifts and coupling patterns suggested that the only difference between 2 and 3 was that the hydroxy group attached at C-2 in 2 was replaced by one hydrogen in 3. This was confirmed by the correlations from the COSY, HSQC and HMBC spectra of 3 (A). In the ROESY spectrum of 3, the correlations of H-12 with H-4, 4-OH, H-2a and H-2b suggested that the methyl group attached at C-3 took an equ the correlations of the axial H-3 with H-4, H-2b and 1-OH suggested that H-3, H-4, H-2 and 1-OH were on the same side of A- the absence of the correlation of H-2a with 1-OH and the large coupling constants (J = 13.6 Hz) between H-2a and H-3 further confirmed that H-2a was on the different side of A-ring with H-3 and 1-OH (B). Therefore, the absolute configuration of 3 could be either (1S, 3S, 4S) or (1R, 3R, 4R). The experimental electronic circular dichroism (ECD) spectrum of 3 matched that of the calculated ECD spectrum of (1S, 3S, 4S)-3 instead of that of (1R, 3R, 4R)-3 (C). Thus, compound 3’s absolute configuration was identified as (1S, 3S, 4S) and named as fluostation O.Compound 4 was obtained as orange solid. HRESIMS analysis afforded an [M - H]- ion at m/z 357.0975, giving the molecular formula of 4 as C19H18O7. The comparison of 1H-NMR spectra of 2 and 4 showed that the resonance at δH 2.24 (m, H-3) in 2 disappeared in 4, and the resonance at δH 1.04 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, H3-12) in 2 was replaced by δH 0.85 (s, H3-12) in 4 (). The 13C-NMR spectrum of 4 resembled that of 2 except that the resonance at δC 33.3 (C-3) in 2 was replaced by δC 74.2 (C-3) in 4, the resonance at δC 74.0 (C-2), δC 69.5 (C-4), δC 66.2 (C-1) and δC 12.2 (C-12) in 2 shifted downfield to δC 77.4 (C-2), δC 73.5 (C-4), δC 70.2 (C-1) and δC 15.4 (C-12) in 4, respectively (). These different chemical shifts and coupling patterns suggested that the only difference between 2 and 4 was that 4 contained one more hydroxy group attached at C-3. This was confirmed by the correlations from the COSY, HSQC and HMBC spectra of 4 (A). In the ROESY spectrum of 4, the correlation of H-12 with H-1 suggested that both H-12 and H-1 took axial conformations and were on the same side of A- the correlation of H-2 with H-4 suggested that both H-2 and H-4 took axial conformations and were on the same side of A- the correlation of axial H-2 with 3-OH suggested that H-2 and 3-OH were on the same side of A-ring, and H-2 and H-12 were on the different side of A-ring (B). Therefore, the absolute configuration of 4 could be either (1R, 2S, 3S, 4R) or (1S, 2R, 3R, 4S). The experimental electronic circular dichroism (ECD) spectrum of 4 matched that of the calculated ECD spectrum of (1R, 2S, 3S, 4R)-4 instead of that of (1S, 2R, 3R, 4S)-4 (D), identifying the absolute configuration of 4 as (1R, 2S, 3S, 4R). Compound 4 was successfully crystallized from the solvent of CHCl3:MeOH (9:1) and the crystal structure was solved based on the analysis of diffraction data obtained from Cu Kα radiation (Flack parameter = 0.00(13)), unambiguously identifying the absolute configuration of 4 as (1R, 2S, 3S, 4R) (C). The crystal structure of 4 also confirmed that our calculated ECD experiments were reliable, and 4 was named as fluostatin P.Compound 5 was obtained as orange solid. HRESIMS analysis afforded an [M - H]- ion at m/z 339.0865, giving the molecular formula of 5 as C19H16O6. The 1H-NMR spectrum of 5 resembled that of 4 except that the resonance at δH 4.77 (br s, 2-OH) and δH 5.10 (br s, 3-OH) in 4 disappeared in 5, the resonance at δH 3.59 (dd, J = 6.7, 3.8 Hz, H-2) in 4 shifted upfield to δH 3.28 (d, J = 3.1 Hz, H-2) in 5, and the resonance at δH 4.74 (dd, J = 6.7, 4.8 Hz, H-1), δH 4.31 (br d, J = 5.2 Hz, H-4), and δH 0.85 (s, H3-12) in 4 shifted downfield to δH 5.82 (dd, J = 6.0, 3.1 Hz, H-1), δH 4.80 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, H-4), and δH 1.47 (s, H3-12) in 5 (). The 13C-NMR spectrum of 5 resembled that of 4 except that the resonance at δC 77.4 (C-2), δC 74.2 (C-3), δC 70.2 (C-1) and δC 73.5 (C-4) in 4 shifted upfield to δC 59.2 (C-2), δC 58.2 (C-3), δC 59.9 (C-1) and δC 67.7 (C-4) in 5, respectively, and the resonance at δC 15.4 (C-12) in 4 shifted downfield to δC 18.8 (C-12) in 5 (). These different chemical shifts and coupling patterns suggested that the only difference between 4 and 5 was that the 2,3-diol moiety in 4 was replaced by one 2,3-epoxide moiety in 5. This was confirmed by the correlations from the COSY, HSQC and HMBC spectra of 5 (A). In the ROESY spectrum of 5, the correlation of H-4 with 1-OH suggested that both H-4 and 1-OH took axial conformations and were on the same side of A-ring, which should be in a stable “boot” conformation due to the 2,3- the correlation of axial H-4 with H-12, H-12 with H-2 suggested that H-4, H-12, H-2 and 1-OH were on the same side of A-ring (B). The small coupling constant (J = 3.1 Hz) between H-2 and H-1, although they were on the different side of A-ring, was very similar to that (J = 2.0 Hz) between H-2 and H-1 in fluostatin D, whose crystallographic structure has been solved with X-ray diffraction analysis []. Therefore, the absolute configuration of 5 could be either (1R, 2S, 3R, 4R) or (1S, 2R, 3S, 4S). The experimental electronic circular dichroism (ECD) spectrum of 5 matched that of the calculated ECD spectrum of (1R, 2S, 3R, 4R)-5 instead of that of (1S, 2R, 3S, 4S)-5 (E), identifying the absolute configuration of 5 as (1R, 2S, 3R, 4R). The absolute configuration of 5 were consistent with that of crystal structure fluostatin D, and 5 was named as fluostatin Q.Until now, there have been 16 fluostatin analogues discovered from terrestrial and marine actinomycetes [,,,,] or heterologous expression of environmental DNAs []. Compared to known fluostatins, compounds 1–5 contain different methoxy group attached at C-7; compounds 2–5 contain different hydroxy group attached at C-4; and compound 4 contains high oxidized A-ring with four hydroxy groups attached at C-1, C-2, C-3 and C-4. These new structural properties enrich the structural diversity of fluostatins, highlight marine actinomycetes as important sources of new aromatic polyketides and indicate unusual issues in their biosynthesis.All compounds 1–5 were assessed for their biological activities with multiple assays. In the antibacterial activity assays against Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 and vancomycin resistant Enterococci faecalis A4 (VRE), 1–5 all showed no activity with the minimal inhibition concentrations (MIC) larger than 25 uM. In the inhibitory assays against nitric oxide (NO) production induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS), 1–5 all showed no activity with the inhibition rate below 10% at the concentration of 10 uM. In the cytotoxicity assays against human liver cancer cell line HepG2, 1–5 all showed no activity with the inhibition rate below 10% at the concentration of 10 uM. More biological assays are needed to reveal a potential of medical use for 1–5.
2.3. Proposed Biosynthetic Pathways of Compounds 1–5Fluostatins, distinct to other angucyclinones, feature a fluorenone chromophore with a unique 6-5-6-6 carbon ring skeleton (). The formation of the five-membered C-ring of fluostatins is most fascinating in the biosynthetic research, and several reports have proposed that the 6-5-6-6 ring skeleton of fluostatins were from the rearrangement of diazo-containing 6-6-5-6 ring skeleton [,,], exemplified by prekinamycin and prelomaiviticin in the kinamycin and lomaiviticin biosynthesis, respectively [,]. Two fluostatin biosynthetic gene clusters, the fls from marine Micromonospora rosaria SCSIO N160 [] and the other from environmental DNAs [], have been reported. They showed high homology with each other and their gene organizations were almost identical (A). The heterologous expression of the fls gene cluster and gene inactivations have identified the cluster’s boundary and confirmed the cluster is intact []. However, the biosynthesis of the five-membered C-ring of fluostatins still remain elusive. We sequenced the genomic DNA of PKU-MA00045 and identified the putative biosynthetic gene cluster (named as fluo, boundary not identified) of 1–5, based on the searching of homologues in the published fluostatin gene clusters. Surprisingly, the fluo gene cluster contained different genes and gave different gene organizations compared to the above two published ones. The homologues of genes of flsU1, flsQ1, flsO4, flsP, flsH, flsQ2, flsO5, flsN1, flsN2 and flsR3 in the fls gene cluster were absent in the fluo the minimal core PKS genes, flsA-C (encoding KSα, KSβ and ACP), together with surrounding genes in the fls gene cluster showed different transcription directions and different relative positions compared to their homologues in the fluo the homologues of six genes flsV, flsU2, flsN3, flsN4, flsS and flsT in the fls gene cluster, which are the conserved genes proposed for the diazo assembly in kinamycin, lomaiviticin and fluostatin biosynthesis [,,], also presented in the fluo gene cluster but showed different transcription directions and relative positions (A, ). When we searched the homologues of genes in the fluo gene cluster by BLAST, we found that many genes showed high sequence identities to homologues from one gene cluster in the genome of Streptomyces albus DSM41398. A further comparison revealed that the fluo gene cluster contained almost the same genes and gene organizations as the gene cluster from Streptomyces albus DSM41398 (A), suggesting that Streptomyces albus DSM41398 is another potential fluostatin producer. The two published fluostatin gene clusters are from environmental DNAs and Micromonospora rosaria SCSIO N160, and the fluo gene cluster and its close homology are both from Streptomyces, suggesting that the different genera of strains may account for the differences between fluostatin biosynthetic gene clusters.Based on known biosynthetic research, we proposed the biosynthetic pathways of compounds 1–5. The type II PKS, Fluo9-11, catalyzed the iterative linear polyketide chain elongation using one molecule of acetyl-CoA as the starter unit and nine molecules of malonyl-CoA as the extender units [,,,]; the ketoacyl reductase Fluo12 and cyclases Fluo8 and Fluo13, catalyzed the reduction and cyclization reactions to generate UWM6, which is a common intermediate in angucyclinone biosynthesis [,,]; the dehydratase Fluo14 converted the UWM6 to prejadomycin, which was oxidized to generate dehydrorabelomycin by the oxygenase Fluo15 [,]; the dehydrorabelomycin was converted to hydroquinone-kinobscurinone by the two associated enzymes Fluo5 and Fluo6, whose homologues AlpK and AlpJ have been confirmed to catalyze the same reactions in kinamycin biosynthesis [,]; the six associated enzymes Fluo21-26 converted hydroquinone-kinobscurinone to the diazo-containing prekinamycin [], which underwent unknown rearrangement steps to generate prefluostatin with the unique 6-5-6-6 carbon ring skeleton [,,]; then the prefluostatin underwent multiple tailoring steps including methylation and oxidation to generate 1–5 (B). In the tailoring steps converting prefluostatin to 1–5, the methyltransferase Fluo39 and hydrolase Fluo34 may participate in the methylation of the 7-hydroxy group and the hydrolyzation of the 2,3-epoxide ring, respectively. In the rearrangement converting prekinamycin to prefluostatin, no candidate could be identified only based on the bioinformatics analysis and comparison between the gene clusters. However, the absence of homologues of flsU1, flsQ1, flsO4, flsP, flsH, flsQ2, flsO5, flsN1, flsN2 and flsR3 in the fluo gene cluster suggests that these genes may not participate in this key rearrangement. The sequencing of the fluo gene cluster and the comparative analyses between the fluostatin biosynthetic gene clusters in this study set the stage for future characterizations of the functions of other genes in the fls and fluo gene clusters, to fully understand the formation of the 6-5-6-6 carbon ring skeleton and the tailoring modifications.
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. General Experimental ProceduresOptical rotations were measured on an Autopol III automatic polarimeter (Rudolph Research Analytical, Hackettstown, NJ, USA). UV spectra were collected on a Cary 300 spectrometer (VARIAN, Palo Alto, CA, USA). IR spectra were collected on a Nicolet Nexus 470 FT-IR spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). CD spectra were collected on a J-810 spectropolarimeter (Jasco Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). 1H and 13C-NMR spectra were collected on a Bruker Avance-600 NMR spectrometer (Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA). HRESIMS spectra were collected on a Waters Xevo G2 Q-TOF spectrometer (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). HPLC analysis was performed on an Agilent 1260 series (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with a C18 RP-column (Eclipse XDBC18, 150 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Semi-preparative HPLC was performed on a SSI 23201 system (Scientific Systems Inc., State College, PA, USA) with a YMC-Pack ODS-A column (250 × 10 mm, 5 μm, YMC CO., LTD. Shimogyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan). MPLC was performed on a LC3000 series (Beijing Tong Heng Innovation Technology, Beijing, China) with a ClaricepTM Flash i-series C18 cartridge (20–35 μm, 40 g, Bonna-Agela, Wilmington, DE, USA). Size exclusion chromatography was carried out using a Sephadex LH-20 (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) column.
3.2. PCR Screening for Potential Producers of Angucyclinones from a Marine Bacteria CollectionWe have previously reported the isolation of 180 marine bacteria from 15 sponge samples that were collected from South China Sea []. We have extracted all strains’ genomic DNAs and discovered nonribosomal peptides (bacillibactin and bacillomycin D analogues) by using a PCR screening method []. In this study, the forward primer (5′-GGCAGCGGITTCGGCGGITTCCAG-3′) and the reverse primer (5′-CGITGTTIACIGCGTAGAACCAGGCG-3′), designed from the conserved sequences of KSα and KSβ in the biosynthesis of tetracenomycin, daunorubicin, actinorhodin and fredericamycin [], were used in the PCR screening for aromatic polyketide producers. A 20 μL PCR system consisting of 10 uL Easy Taq Polymerase (Beijing TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China), 2 uL of forward and reverse primer mixture (each for 10 uM), 1 uL genomic DNA (50–100 ng), and 7 uL sterilized water, were used. The PCR program was performed with an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 60 °C for 1 min and extension at 72 °C for 1 min, followed by incubation at 72 °C for 10 min. In total, 167 strains were screened and the PCR products were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis, recovered with a gel purification kit (Beijing TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China) and sequenced to afford 12 “positive” strains.
3.3. Small-Scale Fermentation and HPLC AnalysisFor each of the 12 “positive” strains, 50 uL of spore suspension was inoculated into 50 mL of seed medium M1 (yeast extract 1 g, peptone 5 g, beef extract 1 g, FePO4 0.01 g, and sea salt 33 g in 1.0 L distilled H2O, pH 7.4), and incubated with a HYG-C shaker (Suzhou Peiying Laboratory Equipment, Suzhou, China) at 28 °C, 200 rpm for three days. Two milliliters of the resultant seed culture was inoculated into 50 mL of production media, and the fermentation continued at 28 °C, 200 rpm for seven days. Four different production media, M1, M2 (glycerol 6 mL, arginine 1 g, K2HPO4 1 g, MgSO4 0.5 g, sea salt 33 g in 1.0 L distilled H2O, pH 7.2), M3 (soluble starch 20 g, KNO3 1 g, K2HPO4 0.5 g, MgSO4·7H2O 0.5 g, NaCl 0.5 g, FeSO4·7H2O 0.01 g, sea salt 33 g in 1.0 L distilled H2O, pH 7.2) and M4 (soluble starch 10 g, casein 0.3 g, K2HPO4 2 g, KNO3 2 g, MgSO4·7H2O 0.05 g, NaCl 2 g, FeSO4·7H2O 0.01 g, CaCO3 0.02 g, sea salt 33 g in 1.0 L distilled H2O, pH 7.2), were used in the small-scale fermentation. The Diaion HP20 (2 g/100 mL, Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) and Amberlite XAD-16 (2 g/100 mL, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) resins were added 10 h before the fermentation finished. The resins and cell mass were harvested by centrifugation, washed with distilled H2O and extracted with MeOH. The MeOH extracts were concentrated and analyzed by HPLC. The HPLC analysis was carried out with a flow rate of 1 mL/min with UV detection at 254 nm, using a gradient elution program from 5% MeOH in H2O to 100% MeOH over 45 min.
3.4. Phylogenetic AnalysisThe phylogenetic analysis of strains PKU-MA00045 (isolated from a sponge Sinularia species) was carried out by sequence alignments of its 16S rRNAs (GeneBank accession number MF435987) with different Streptomyces homologues. The forward primer (5′-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3′) and reverse primer (5′-TACGGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′) [] were used to amplify the 16S rDNA genes. Homologous genes were searched using BLAST on the NCBI website and the phylogenetic tree was generated with Mega 7.0 (Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA) using the Neighbor-Joining algorithm.
3.5. Large-Scale Fermentation and IsolationThe large-scale fermentation of Streptomyces sp. PKU-MA00045 in medium M4 were carried out with similar procedures used in the small-scale fermentation. Briefly, 50 uL of spore suspension was inoculated into 50 mL of seed medium (medium M1) and incubated with HYG-C shakers at 28 °C, 200 rpm for three days. Eight milliliters of the resultant seed culture was inoculated into 200 mL of medium M4 in 1 L Erlenmeyer flasks, and the fermentation continued at 28 °C, 200 rpm for seven days. The Diaion HP20 (2 g/100 mL), and Amberlite XAD-16 (2 g/100 mL) resins were added 10 h before the fermentation finished. The resins and cell mass were harvested by centrifugation, washed with distilled H2O and extracted with MeOH.A 15 L fermentation of Streptomyces sp.PKU-MA00045 gave a 4.5 g of MeOH extract. The MeOH extract was concentrated, resuspended in H2O and extracted with EtOAc three times. The EtOAc extract (2.0 g) was loaded onto MPLC with an elution program of step-gradient of MeOH in H2O (30%, 65%, 95%) to yield nine fractions (F1–F9), at the flowrate of 17 mL/min and under the detection of 254 nm. Fraction F7 was purified by semi-preparative HPLC with MeOH/H2O (49/51, v/v) as the mobile phase, to afford compounds 1 (2.8 mg), 2 (1.0 mg), 4 (4.8 mg) and 5 (0.7 mg); fraction F8 was purified by semi-preparative HPLC with MeOH/H2O (59/41, v/v) as the mobile phase to yield compound 3 (0.8 mg). All semi-preparative HPLCs were carried out at a flowrate of 2 mL/min and under the detection of 260 nm.Fluostatin M (1):
-9.3 (c 0.3, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 269 (3.93), 297 (3.68), 438 (3.16) IR (KBr) νmax , , 836 cm-1; 1H and 13C-NMR data, HRESIMS m/z 339.0870 [M - H]- (calcd. for C19H15O6, 339.0869).Fluostatin N (2):
+24 (c 0.1, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 218 (3.97), 246 (3.86), 261 (3.86), 272 (3.79), 340 (3.01), 445 (3.01) IR (KBr) νmax , ,
cm-1; 1H and 13C-NMR data, HRESIMS m/z 341.1023 [M - H]- (calcd. for C19H17O6, 341.1025).Fluostatin O (3):
+39 (c 0.04, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 217 (3.78), 246 (3.70), 260 (3.72), 272 (3.64), 340 (2.91), 445 (2.68) IR (KBr) νmax , , , , 1017 cm-1; 1H and 13C NMR data, HRESIMS m/z 325.1084 [M - H]- (calcd. for C19H17O5, 325.1076).Fluostatin P (4):
+8.9 (c 0.3, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 218 (3.89), 246 (3.76), 261 (3.76), 273 (3.72), 340 (3.04), 445 (2.77) IR (KBr) νmax ,
cm-1; 1H and 13C NMR data, HRESIMS m/z 357.0975 [M - H]- (calcd. for C19H17O7, 357.0974).Fluostatin Q (5):
+14 (c 0.07, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 218 (3.90), 245 (3.79), 261 (3.80), 272 (3.76), 340 (3.01), 449 (2.77) IR (KBr) νmax , , 1032 cm-1; 1H and 13C-NMR data, HRESIMS m/z 339.0865 [M - H]- (calcd. for C19H15O6, 339.0869).
3.6. ECD Calculation of 1–5Conformational analysis of the enantiomers of 1–5 established by ROESY analyses were carried out via Monte Carlo searching with the MMFF94s molecular mechanics force field using the Spartan 10 software (Wavefunction Inc., Irvine, CA, USA). Compounds 1–5 gave 3, 5, 4, 4, 3 geometries, respectively, which possessed relative energies within 10 kcal/mol. These geometries were optimized by DFT at the B3LYP/6-31G (d) level (methanol as the solvent) with the Gaussian 09 program (Gaussian Inc., Wallingford, CT, USA). The B3LYP/6-31G(d)-optimized conformers were then optimized at the wB97XD/DGDZVP level (methanol as the solvent). ECD computations for all wB97XD/DGDZVP-optimized conformers were carried out at the CAM-B3LYP/DGDZVP level (methanol as the solvent). Boltzmann statistics were performed for ECD simulations with a standard deviation of σ 0.3 eV. Then, the ECD spectra were simulated by the Gaussum 2.25 program [] and generated according to the Boltzmann distribution theory and their relative Gibbs free energy (ΔG).
3.7. X-ray Crystallographic Analysis of Compound 4Orange crystals of compound 4 were obtained from the solvent of CHCl3:MeOH (9:1). The X-ray diffraction data were collected on a MicroMax-003 HomeLab CCD X-ray single crystal diffractometer (Rigaku Americas Corporation, The Woodlands, TX, USA) at the State Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, Peking University, with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54184 ?) used. The structure was solved by direct methods (SHELXT-14) and refined using full-matrix least-squares difference Fourier techniques. Crystallographic data have been deposited in the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center with the deposition number CCDC 1815221.
4. ConclusionsThe marine environments characterized by high salinity, high pressure and low temperature hold the promise of producing new natural products structurally or bioactively distinct from those from terrestrial environments. In this study, we discovered five new fluostatin analogues (1–5) from marine Streptomyces sp. PKU-MA00045 with a PCR-based genome mining method. These atypical angucyclinones featured a 6-5-6-6 ring skeleton and high oxidized A-rings, highlighting marine actinomycetes as important producers of new aromatic polyketides. The biosynthetic gene cluster of compounds 1–5 showed distinct gene contents and gene organizations with two known fluostatin biosynthetic gene clusters, facilitating the full characterization of the 6-5-6-6 carbon ring skeleton formation and the tailoring modifications. These results have inspired our further effort on new marine natural products discovery and related biosynthetic research.
Supplementary MaterialsThe following are available online at , Table S1: The 12 “positive” strains and the homologues of their PCR products, Table S2: The deduced functions of genes from the fluo gene cluster and their homologues from the fls gene cluster, Figure S1: The representative new aromatic polyketides discovered from marine actinomycetes, Figure S2: The agarose gel electrophoresis analysis of the 12 “positive” PCR products, Figure S3: the phylogenetic analysis of strain PKU-MA00045, Figures S4–S13: The NMR, MS and IR spectra of compound 1, Figures S14–S21: the NMR, MS and IR spectra of compound 2, Figures S22–S29: the NMR, MS and IR spectra of compound 3, Figures S30–S37: the NMR, MS and IR spectra of compound 4, Figures S38–S45: the NMR, MS and IR spectra of compound 5.AcknowledgmentsThis research was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number , grant number
and grant number ). We thank Fuling Yin in State Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University for X-ray diffraction data collection and analysis.Author ContributionsJ.J., X.Y. and T.L. M.M. and D.Y. conceived and desi J.J., X.Y., T.L., H.X., G.W., M.Z., F.L. perfo Y.Z., D.L., M.C., W.C., D.Y. and M.M. M.M. wrote the manuscript.Conflicts of InterestThe authors declare no conflict of interest.ReferencesFenical, W.; Jensen, P.R. Developing a new resource for drug discovery: Marine Actinomycete bacteria. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2006, 2, 666–673. [] [] []Valliappan, K.; Sun, W.; Li, Z.Y. Marine actinobacteria associated with marine organisms and their potentials in producing pharmaceutical natural products. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, . [] [] []Manivasagan, P.; Kang, K.H.; Sivakumar, K.; Li-Chan, E.C.; Oh, H.M.; Kim, S.K. Marine actinobacteria: An important source of bioactive natural products. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2014, 38, 172–188. [] [] []Jensen, P.R.; Moore, B.S.; Fenical, W. The marine actinomycete genus Salinispora: A model organism for secondary metabolite discovery. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2015, 32, 738–751. [] [] []Helmke, E.; Weyland, H. Rhodococcus marinonascens sp. nov., an actinomycete from the sea. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1984, 34, 127–138. [] []Kamjam, M.; Sivalingam, P.; Deng, Z.X.; Hong, K. Deep sea actinomycetes and their secondary metabolites. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 760–768. [] [] []Dhakal, D.; Pokhrel, A.R.; Shrestha, B.; Sohng, J.K. Marine rare actinobacteria: Isolation, characterization, and strategies for harnessing bioactive compounds. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, . [] [] []Hassana, S.S.U.; Shaikh, A.L. Marine actinobacteria as a drug treasure house. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 87, 46–57. [] [] []He, H.Y.; Ding, W.D.; Bernan, V.S.; Richardso, A.D.; Ireland, C.M.; Greenstein, M.; Ellestad, G.A.; Carter, G.T. Lomaiviticins A and B, potent antitumor antibiotics from Micromonospora lomaivitiensis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, . [] [] []Maskey, R.P.; Helmke, E.; Kayser, O.; Fiebig, H.H.; Maier, A.; Busche, A.; Laatsch, H. Anti-cancer and antibacterial trioxacarcins with high anti-malaria activity from a marine Streptomycete and their absolute stereochemistry. J. Antibiot. 2004, 57, 771–779. [] [] []Itoh, T.; Kinoshita, M.; Aoki, S.; Kobayashi, M. Komodoquinone, A, a novel neuritogenic anthracycline, from marine Streptomyces sp. KS3. J. Nat. Prod. 2003, 66, . [] [] []Das, A.; Khosla, C. Biosynthesis of aromatic polyketides in bacteria. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 631–639. [] [] []Kharel, M.K.; Pahari, P.; Shepherd, M.D.; Tibrewal, N.; Nybo, S.E.; Shaaban, K.A.; Rohr, J. Angucyclines: Biosynthesis, mode-of-action, new natural products, and synthesis. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2012, 29, 264–325. [] [] []Hertweck, C. The biosynthetic logic of polyketide diversity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2009, 48, . [] [] []Weber, T.; Blin, K.; Duddela, S.; Krug, D.; Kim, H.U.; Bruccoleri, R.; Lee, S.Y.; Fischbach, M.A.; Müller, R.; Wohlleben, W.; et al. AntiSMASH 3.0—A comprehensive resource for the genome mining of biosynthetic gene clusters. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, W237–W243. [] [] []Parikesit, A.A.; Stadler, P.F.; Prohaska, S.J. Evolution and quantitative comparison of genome-wide protein domain distributions. Genes 2011, 2, 912–924. [] [] []Prohaska, S.J.; Stadler, P.F.; Krakauer, D.C. Innovation in gene regulation: The case of chromatin computation. J. Theor. Biol. 2010, 265, 27–44. [] [] []Eddy, S.R. Hidden Markov models. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1996, 6, 361–365. [] []Zhou, M.J.; Liu, F.W.; Yang, X.Y.; Jin, J.; Dong, X.; Zeng, K.W.; Liu, D.; Zhang, Y.T.; Ma, M.; Yang, D.H. Bacillibactin and bacillomycin analogues with cytotoxicities against human cancer cell lines from marine Bacillus sp. PKU-MA00093 and PKU-MA00092. Mar. Drugs. 2018, 16, 22. [] [] []Xie, P.; Ma, M.; Rateb, M.E.; Shaaban, K.A.; Yu, Z.; Huang, S.X.; Zhao, L.X.; Zhu, X.; Yan, Y.; Peterson, R.M.; et al. Biosynthetic potential-based strain prioritization for natural product discovery: A showcase for diterpenoid-producing actinomycetes. J. Nat. Prod. 2014, 77, 377–387. [] [] []Rohr, J.; Thiericke, R. Angucycline group antibiotics. Nat. Prod. Rep. 1992, 2, 103–137. [] []Akiyama, T.; Nakamura, K.T.; Takahashi, Y.; Naganawa, H.; Muraoka, Y.; Aoyagi, T.; Takeuchi, T. Fluostatins A and B, new inhibitors of dipeptidyl peptidase III, produced by Streptomyces sp. TA-3391. II. Structure determination. J. Antibiot. 1998, 51, 586–588. [] [] []Zhang, W.J.; Liu, Z.; Li, S.M.; Lu, Y.Z.; Chen, Y.C.; Zhang, H.B.; Zhang, G.T.; Zhu, Y.G.; Zhang, G.Y.; Zhang, W.M.; et al. Fluostatins I–K from the South China Sea-derived Micromonospora rosaria SCSIO N160. J. Nat. Prod. 2012, 75, . [] [] []Schneider, K.; Nicholson, G.; Str?bele, M.; Baur, S.; Niehaus, J.; Fiedler, H.P.; Süssmuth, R.D. The structures of fluostatins C, D and E, novel members of the fluostatin family. J. Antibiot. 2006, 59, 105–109. [] [] []Yang, C.F.; Huang, C.S.; Zhang, W.J.; Zhu, Y.G.; Zhang, C.S. Heterologous expression of fluostatin gene cluster leads to a bioactive heterodimer. Org. Lett. 2015, 17, . [] [] []Zhang, W.J.; Yang, C.F.; Huang, C.S.; Zhang, L.P.; Zhang, H.B.; Zhang, Q.B.; Yuan, C.S.; Zhu, Y.G.; Zhang, C.S. Pyrazolofluostatins A-C, pyrazole-fused benzo[a]fluorenes from South China Sea-Derived Micromonospora rosaria SCSIO N160. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 592–595. [] [] []Feng, Z.Y.; Kim, J.H.; Brady, S.F. Fluostatins produced by the heterologous expression of a TAR reassembled environmental DNA derived type II PKS gene cluster. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 1. [] [] []Wang, B.; Guo, F.; Ren, J.W.; Ai, G.M.; Aigle, B.; Fan, K.Q.; Yang, K.Q. Identification of Alp1U and Lom6 as epoxy hydrolases and implications for kinamycin and lomaiviticin biosynthesis. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, . [] [] []Janso, J.E.; Haltli, B.A.; Eustáquio, A.S.; Kulowski, K.; Waldman, A.J.; Zha, L.; Nakamura, H.; Bernan, V.S.; He, H.Y.; Carter, G.T.; et al. Discovery of the lomaiviticin biosynthetic gene cluster in Salinispora pacifica. Tetrahedron 2014, 70, . [] [] []Wang, B.; Ren, J.W.; Li, L.Y.; Guo, F.; Pan, G.H.; Ai, G.M.; Aigle, B.; Fan, K.Q.; Yang, K.Q. Kinamycin biosynthesis employs a conserved pair of oxidases for B-ring contraction. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, . [] [] []Heuer, H.; Krsek, M.; Baker, P.; Smalla, K.; Wellington, E.M. Analysis of actinomycete communities by specific amplification of genes encoding 16S rRNA and gel-electrophoretic separation in denaturing gradients. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997, 63, . []
[]O’Boyle, N.M.; Tenderholt, A.L.; Langner, K.M. Cclib: A library for package-independent computational chemistry algorithms. J. Comput. Chem. 2008, 29, 839–845. [] [] []
The structures of fluostatins M–Q (1–5) from Streptomyces sp. PKU-MA00045.
The structures of fluostatins M–Q (1–5) from Streptomyces sp. PKU-MA00045.
The key COSY, HMBC and ROESY correlations of fluostatins M–Q (1–5) and the crystallographic structure of fluostatin P (4). (A) The key COSY and HMBC correlations of fluostatins M–Q (1–5). (B) The key ROESY correlations of fluostatins M–Q (1–5). (C) The crystallographic structure of fluostatin P (4).
The key COSY, HMBC and ROESY correlations of fluostatins M–Q (1–5) and the crystallographic structure of fluostatin P (4). (A) The key COSY and HMBC correlations of fluostatins M–Q (1–5). (B) The key ROESY correlations of fluostatins M–Q (1–5). (C) The crystallographic structure of fluostatin P (4).
The calculated and experimental electronic circular dichroism (ECD) spectra of fluostatins M–Q (1–5). (A) The ECD spectra of fluostatin M (1). (B) The ECD spectra of fluostatin N (2). (C) The ECD spectra of fluostatin O (3). (D) The ECD spectra of fluostatin P (4). (E) The ECD spectra of fluostatin Q (5).
The calculated and experimental electronic circular dichroism (ECD) spectra of fluostatins M–Q (1–5). (A) The ECD spectra of fluostatin M (1). (B) The ECD spectra of fluostatin N (2). (C) The ECD spectra of fluostatin O (3). (D) The ECD spectra of fluostatin P (4). (E) The ECD spectra of fluostatin Q (5).
The comparison of fluostatin biosynthetic gene clusters and the proposed biosynthetic pathways of compounds 1–5. (A) The comparison of fluo gene clusters from Streptomyces sp. PKU-MA00045 with other fluostatin biosynthetic gene clusters. The homologous genes between fluo and fls gene clusters were linked with lines. (B) The proposed biosynthetic pathways of compounds 1–5. The protein homologues from the fls pathway are shown in parentheses.
The comparison of fluostatin biosynthetic gene clusters and the proposed biosynthetic pathways of compounds 1–5. (A) The comparison of fluo gene clusters from Streptomyces sp. PKU-MA00045 with other fluostatin biosynthetic gene clusters. The homologous genes between fluo and fls gene clusters were linked with lines. (B) The proposed biosynthetic pathways of compounds 1–5. The protein homologues from the fls pathway are shown in parentheses.
The 1H-NMR (600 MHz) data (J in Hz) of compounds 1–5 in DMSO-d6.
The 1H-NMR (600 MHz) data (J in Hz) of compounds 1–5 in DMSO-d6.
Position1234515.46, d (3.5) a5.12, t (4.3)5.30, m4.74, dd (6.7, 4.8)5.82, dd (6.0, 3.1)24.01, dd (3.5, 2.3) a3.75, td (4.5, 2.3)1.86, td (13.6, 4.0)3.59, dd (6.7, 3.8)3.28, d (3.1)1.52, dt (13.6, 2.5)33.17, qd (6.8, 2.3) a2.24, m2.19, m
4 4.41, dd (7.8, 4.0)4.30, t (4.0)4.31, br d (5.2)4.80, d (8.0)57.40, s7.00, s6.93, s7.09, d (1.0)7.17, d (1.0)87.45, dd (8.3, 1.4)7.41, dd (8.2, 1.3)7.40, dd (8.3, 1.3)7.40, dd (8.3, 1.0)7.40, dd (8.3, 1.2)97.47, dd (8.3, 6.6)7.38, dd (8.2, 6.8)7.37, dd (8.3, 6.7)7.37, dd (8.3, 7.0)7.37, dd (8.3, 6.8)107.36, dd (6.6, 1.4)7.29, dd (6.8, 1.3)7.28, dd (6.7, 1.3)7.29, dd (7.0, 1.0)7.27, dd (6.8, 1.2)121.17, d (6.9) a1.04, d (7.1)0.98, d (7.0)0.85, s1.47, s134.11, s4.10, s4.10, s4.08, s4.09, s1-OH5.46, overlap4.96, d (4.4)4.53, d (3.7)5.08, d (4.8)5.31, d (6.1)2-OH5.31, d (3.5)5.19, d (4.8) 4.77, br s 3-OH
5.10, br s 4-OH 4.81, d (8.0)4.94, d (5.8)5.44, d (5.8)5.93, d (8.2)6-OH9.54, s9.32, s9.30, s9.33, s9.33, s
The 13C-NMR (150 MHz) data of compounds 1-5 in DMSO-d6.
The 13C-NMR (150 MHz) data of compounds 1-5 in DMSO-d6.
Position12345δc, Typeδc, Typeδc, Typeδc, Typeδc, Type163.6, CH66.2, CH60.4, CH70.2, CH59.9, CH274.8, CH74.0, CH33.0, CH277.4, CH59.2, CH341.6, CH33.3, CH28.1, CH74.2, C58.2, C4197.7, C69.5, CH68.7, CH73.5, CH67.7, CH4a134.0, C143.9, C144.2, C143.6, C142.6, C5119.8, CH124.4, CH125.1, CH122.5, CH121.6, CH6150.9, C150.2, C150.0, C150.4, C150.5, C6a132.5, C126.7, C126.2, C126.2,C125.1, C6b127.9, C128.9, C128.9, C129.1, C128.9, C7151.8, C151.0, C151.0, C151.1, C151.0, C8120.5, CH119.6, CH119.4, CH120.0, CH119.5, CH9131.8, CH130.6, CH130.5, CH130.7, CH130.5, CH10117.7, CH117.7, CH117.6, CH118.0, CH117.6, CH10a135.3, C134.7, C134.8, C,134.5, C134.7, C11192.1, C193.4, C193.2, C194.4, C193.0, C11a131.6, C132.0, C131.1, C130.8, C130.6, C11b134.7, C129.8, C131.5, C131.7, C128.3, C1211.3, CH312.2, CH317.2, CH315.4, CH318.8, CH31357.5, CH357.4, CH357.4, CH357.4, CH357.4, CH3
(C) 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ().
MDPI Initiatives
Follow MDPI}