Yes,Sun Cinema is the newest noe.You can sit the_百度知道
Yes,Sun Cinema is the newest noe.You can sit the
Yes,Sun Cinema is the newest noe.You can sit the most comfortably because they have the biggest seats
提问者采纳
是的，太阳电影院是最新的，你能坐得最舒服，因为他们有最大的座位
提问者评价
你的回答完美的解决了我的问题，谢谢！
来自:作业帮
其他类似问题
sit的相关知识
按默认排序
其他1条回答
是的，太阳电影院是最新的一个。你坐在那儿是最舒服的因为他们有着最大的座位
等待您来回答
下载知道APP
随时随地咨询
出门在外也不愁Low IQ & Conservative Beliefs Linked to Prejudice
A black and white businessman face off.
There's no gentle way to put it: People who give in to racism and prejudice may simply be dumb, according to a new study that is bound to stir public controversy.
The research finds that children with low intelligence are more likely to hold prejudiced attitudes as adults. These findings point to a vicious cycle, according to lead researcher Gordon Hodson, a psychologist at Brock University in Ontario. Low-intelligence adults tend to gravitate toward , the study found. Those ideologies, in turn, stress hierarchy and resistance to change, attitudes that can contribute to prejudice, Hodson wrote in an email to LiveScience.
&Prejudice is extremely complex and multifaceted, making it critical that any factors
are uncovered and understood,& he said.
Controversy ahead
The findings combine three hot-button topics.
&They've pulled off the trifecta of controversial topics,& said Brian Nosek, a social and cognitive psychologist at the University of Virginia who was not involved in the study. &When one selects intelligence, political ideology and
and looks at any of the relationships between those three variables, it's bound to upset somebody.&
Polling data and social and political science research do show that prejudice is more common in those who hold right-wing ideals that those of other political persuasions, Nosek told LiveScience. []
&The unique contribution here is trying to make some progress on the most challenging aspect of this,& Nosek said, referring to the new study. &It's not that a relationship like that exists, but why it exists.&
Brains and bias
Earlier studies have found links between low levels of education and higher levels of prejudice, Hodson said, so studying intelligence seemed a logical next step. The researchers turned to two studies of citizens in the United Kingdom, one that has followed babies since their births in March 1958, and another that did the same for babies born in April 1970. The children in the studies had their intelligence assessed at age 10 or 11; as adults ages 30 or 33, their levels of social conservatism and racism were measured. []
In the first study, verbal and nonverbal intelligence was measured using tests that asked people to find similarities and differences between words, shapes and symbols. The second study measured cognitive abilities in four ways, including number recall, shape-drawing tasks, defining words and identifying patterns and similarities among words. Average IQ is set at 100.
Social conservatives were defined as people who agreed with a laundry list of statements such as &Family life suffers if mum is working full-time,& and &Schools should teach children to obey authority.& Attitudes toward other races were captured by measuring agreement with statements such as &I wouldn't mind working with people from .& (These questions measured overt prejudiced attitudes, but most people, no matter how egalitarian, ; Hodson's work can't speak to this &underground& racism.)
As suspected,
corresponded with racism in adulthood. But the factor that explained the relationship between these two variables was political: When researchers included social conservatism in the analysis, those ideologies accounted for much of the link between brains and bias.
People with lower cognitive abilities also had less contact with people of other races.
&This finding is consistent with recent research demonstrating that intergroup contact is mentally challenging and cognitively draining, and consistent with findings that contact reduces prejudice,& said Hodson, who along with his colleagues published these results online Jan. 5 in the journal Psychological Science.
A study of averages
Hodson was quick to note that the despite the link found between low intelligence and , the researchers aren't implying that all liberals are brilliant and all conservatives stupid. The research is a study of averages over large groups, he said.
&There are multiple examples of very bright conservatives and not-so-bright liberals, and many examples of very principled conservatives and very intolerant liberals,& Hodson said.
Nosek gave another example to illustrate the dangers of taking the findings too literally.
&We can say definitively men are taller than women on average,& he said. &But you can't say if you take a random man and you take a random woman that the man is going to be taller. There's plenty of overlap.&
Nonetheless, there is reason to believe that strict right-wing ideology might appeal to those who have trouble grasping the complexity of the world.
&Socially conservative ideologies tend to offer structure and order,& Hodson said, explaining why these beliefs might draw those with low intelligence. &Unfortunately, many of these features can also contribute to prejudice.&
In another study, this one in the United States, Hodson and Busseri compared 254 people with the same amount of education but different levels of ability in abstract reasoning. They found that what applies to racism may also apply to homophobia. People who were poorer at abstract reasoning were more likely to exhibit prejudice against gays. As in the U.K. citizens, a lack of contact with gays and more acceptance of right-wing authoritarianism explained the link. []
Simple viewpoints
Hodson and Busseri's explanation of their findings is reasonable, Nosek said, but it is correlational. That means the researchers didn't conclusively prove that the low intelligence caused the later prejudice. To do that, you'd have to somehow randomly assign otherwise identical people to be , liberal or conservative. Those sorts of studies obviously aren't possible.
The researchers controlled for factors such as education and socioeconomic status, making their case stronger, Nosek said. But there are other possible explanations that fit the data. For example, Nosek said, a study of left-wing liberals with stereotypically na&ve views like &every kid is a genius in his or her own way,& might find that people who hold these attitudes are also less bright. In other words, it might not be a particular ideology that is linked to stupidity, but extremist views in general.
&My speculation is that it's not as simple as their model presents it,& Nosek said. &I think that lower cognitive capacity can lead to multiple simple ways to represent the world, and one of those can be embodied in a right-wing ideology where 'People I don't know are threats' and 'The world is a '. ... Another simple way would be to just assume everybody is wonderful.&
Prejudice is of particular interest because understanding the roots of racism and bias could help eliminate them, Hodson said. For example, he said, many
encourage participants to see things from another group's point of view. That mental exercise may be too taxing for people of low IQ.
&There may be cognitive limits in the ability to take the perspective of others, particularly foreigners,& Hodson said. &Much of the present research literature suggests that our prejudices are primarily emotional in origin rather than cognitive. These two pieces of information suggest that it might be particularly fruitful for researchers to consider strategies to change&feelings&toward outgroups,& rather than thoughts.
You can follow &senior writer Stephanie Pappas on Twitter . Follow LiveScience for the latest in science news and discoveries on Twitter &and on .
Editor's Recommendations
Author Bio
Copyright & 2015 All Rights Reserved.403 Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /petit/petit.cgi
on this server.
Apache/2.2.22 (Debian) Server at tbcc.todo.ne.jp Port 80补充句子What can I （）（）you,mmadam?Yes,please.DO you have a green dress()this?Yes,here it is.Well,I like this ().can I()it()?Certainly.The change room is()there..Oh ,you look very nice .()()is it?This one is only 90 yuan.It's a good price.I‘ll()it_百度作业帮
补充句子What can I （）（）you,mmadam?Yes,please.DO you have a green dress()this?Yes,here it is.Well,I like this ().can I()it()?Certainly.The change room is()there..Oh ,you look very nice .()()is it?This one is only 90 yuan.It's a good price.I‘ll()it
What can I （do）（for）you,mmadam?你要买什么,夫人?Yes,please.DO you have a green dress(like 像)this?Yes,here it is.Well,I like this (one).can I(try )it(on 我可以试穿吗?Certainly.The change room is(over )there.更衣间在那边..Oh ,you look very nice .(How )(much )is it?多少钱?This one is only 90 yuan.It's a good price.I‘ll(take / buy 买)it如果不明白,请再问；如果对你有所帮助,请点击本页面中的“选为满意回答”按钮,
Do forLikeDress try onInHow muchTake
What can I do for you, madam?Yes, please. Do you have a green dress like this?Yes, here it is.Well, I like this one. Can I try it on?Certainly. The change room is over there........Oh, you look very nice.How much is it?This one is only 90 yuan.It's a good price. I'll take it.
您可能关注的推广}